The source of Q-anon uncovered

Through channels, the source of Q-anon yesterday was discovered to be a computer algorithm developed by an Indonesian IT firm for the purpose of investigating mass ideological control.

The algorithm, known according to “circles D” as the “cued response query AI” (hence the ‘Q-anonymous’), was borrowed out of a small and unpublicized hack into an early form of what came to be known as Grammarly for word auto-correct employed in various online instruments. The protocol for machine learning involved with how to learn spelling appears to have a close relationship to how human beings understand what constitutes a freind or family member as opposed to someone distant or merely an acquaintance.

The program was written using the same structural mechanisms as the Postmodern Generator (each time you hit ‘refresh’ it will spontaneously generate a somewhat plausible appearing argumentative paper that is completely non-sense. Check it out.)

— see my comments/blogposts about the issues and potential of AI involving this kind of technology. They are about 3 years ago, but I can’t remember the name of the posts! Lol –

According to “D leak”, the Q-anon algorithm used the discourse generating protocol similar to the PM generator yet with modified clausal semantic and contextual lineage parameters. Marketing algorithms chose the sites to begin messaging.

In short, according to the source, from the apparent effectiveness of the Sokal Hoax and others similar, it was hypothesized that the syntax strength (and semantic coherence) of the discourse generation if reduced might be even more effective at generating assent and agreement than the PM generator, or the Sokal paper. As well, due to the loose restraints of the common internet and the ideal of free speech and communication of ideas, along with the general intellectual lack of purpose, ignorance and ‘desire to be in the know’ which characterizes most regular (non-academic) person involvements, such enigmatic assertions might serve to function as a kind of social cohesion catalyst not dissimilar to that which arise and are implemented by institutional religion, cults, or any ideological group for that matter

It appears to have been more of a success than anticipated, for, what actually occurred was a social cohesion which, as part of the cohesion, saw an “other” which was limiting freedom (and being non-patriotic) whereas the algorithm was indeed functioning (in a way) to control people’s ability to form sensibly linked ideas which then motivated them to cohere and then toward action. The actual activity, though, was not anticipated, and most likely, D imagined, will be part of the next phase of the CRQ endeavor, if not some other firm’s.

The source of this information requested to remain, of course, anonymous.

I, myself, know nothing.

But it is indeed interesting. To say the least!

Repost: Presenting honest stories of the Firesign Theatre


An appreciation of past masters: “Firesign Theatre’s ‘Dope Humor of the Seventies’” from @DangerMindsBlog
(Plus- Max Headroom signs on)

“Presenting honest stories of working people as told by rich Hollywood stars”*…

thanks so much Roughly!!
this is like pre-Monty Python’s flying Circus or just right near the same time. This is so good! Brilliant!!

Repost and Comment: Spring, (metaphorically speaking) Within the Patriarchy that is our…

Spring, (metaphorically speaking)

— what an amazing post! So good!!

just read it. I am not fully knowledgeable about everything that is said in this post, it’s veracity, so if anyone else reads this and finds some blatant exaggerations or outright untruths, please let us know.

The only comment I’m gonna make really has nothing to do with the actual contents of the post. i’m going to comment on one sentence: that the holy inquisition lasted 600 years. just in a quick Internet search of “holy inquisition”, since I really am not Very educated about it, let’s just give it the benefit of doubt and say 300 years was when it was really going good.


I just trip out on time scale.

The United States has been around for 250 years; I wonder what generalization we could place on the United States? I mean in the sense that the holy inquisition lasted 400 years or whatever. Somehow, though the “holy inquisition” may have been a institution of the Catholic Church for that long, I ponder just what effect it was having in day today life, and so much as we for sure can talk about all the various vicissitudes in particular occasions into the segments of probably even decades if not 100 years segments.

what strikes me in these type of scales is a certain kind of arrogance that goes into people talking about or asserting some grand truths of how the world is, or the world should be, or what humanity is or how it should be.

I mean this in the sense that, say for example, the noble ideals around the United States. Even taken to a ridiculous extreme, to say that there are some larger truths at play around the ideals of the United States of America and its democracy, these ideals have at most been around for 250 years. sure, we could extrapolate and say they came out of this and that other time and whatever in the development of this idea and whatever. But there is some sort of ideal that goes into being “an American” however we wanna voice it, and whatever this ideal is it’s only been around for 250 years.

and here is the Spanish Inquisition molding ideas about the world and what it is to be human for 600 years.

and then we could even look at what we consider “culture” or “civilizations”.

The one I like to think about is ancient Egypt. Ancient Egypt was going strong for something like 1500 years, and actually I think like 3000 years. I’m asking just what is the ideal of the United States at 250 years old compared to a civilization that can be generalized into 3000 years? 

and if we’re talking about the Spanish Inquisition, the medieval period was going on for something like 400 years as well or 500 years whatever it is.

all I’m really saying is that it smells to me of arrogance of the individual human beings, or even a group of people existing at any time. It just strikes me the arrogance that exudes from peoples ideas of righteousness.

also, if we can even conceptualize into ourselves, which is to say, if I am even able to conceptualize what being an American is, I’m really only drawing from at most 250 years of being human.

how ridiculous It sounds! The claim that the United States or being an American has any sort of substance that could be compared to a civilization, say, that lasted 2000 years.

never mind that any sort of compendium or lineage of ideas that might be grouped together to be called some sort of era, or to be titled to some certain name, is so filled with innumerable vectors of how it could have come to be the case, or why it should be, or the influences involved, or the particularity’s which bring about its conceptual shape, and then all the exceptions that go into the argument about how those conceptual balloons really hold no water at all….

The sheer vastness of time just boggles me. And when I compare various institutions to this vast network of insoluble era, I just find a tremendous humility.

I look out into my present world, and I can’t help but think how stupidly filled with themselves people really are.

i’m not disillusioned; I’m just amazed.xx

Just read the reposted link. An epoch of idiocy, a species of utter small minded dunces.

Simply astounding.x

…and kinda ironic.c

The amaizing trooth: Martha Stewart Makes Stunning Marilyn Manson Allegation

The Queen of Kitchen & Craft has revealed what happened when she visited the shock rocker’s home several years ago.

Martha Stewart Makes Stunning Marilyn Manson Allegation

—– aaaand…Take !

This guy, The Cooking Goth makes food and reviews fast food as well all the while being all gorged out! Make up and all! It’s Marilyn Manson meets…
— Read on

“‘Life’ is of course a misnomer, since viruses, lacking the ability to eat or respire, are officially dead”*…

Half of your genome started out as an infection; if left unchecked, some parts of it can turn deadly all over again: “The Non-Human Living Inside of …

“‘Life’ is of course a misnomer, since viruses, lacking the ability to eat or respire, are officially dead”*…

— The wonderful Ness of that area where their ability to make meaning fails .