Category: Post-modernism
-
The New Christianity: Theological “Strawmen” and The deeper look into the Psychologist who shall not be named.
I think this will be the last energy I spend on JP. The less energy given toward his name the better, I think. But one last thing… I think we can have little more doubt that JP is supplying a new philosophical ground for Christianity; indeed, I might say that he is a theological philosopher.…
-
Anslem’s Argument for the Proof of the Existence of God, the Disruption of Time, and the Categorization of Philosophical Behavior.
I seem to have found a significance for Anslem’s proof. It may be that it is not significance for whether God might exist, but, as I have said, significance for how I present ideas. We will start with the rendition from Princeton’s site. I think they have a pretty good rendition there. Without all the strict logical…
-
…and sowing the seeds: Reply to Blake with draft excerpts from “The Second Moment”.
Reply to Terrence Blake’s recent post over at Agent Swarm: As usual Terrence you pegged it. It’s strange how I view it and actually I can totally agree with you and yet somehow there’s something that I’m not agreeing with and really that has to do with my work, The strange situation that I find…
-
Time is Longer That We Think..
If we think there was a post-modern era, and now we are in a another era, think again. While I have my difficulties with Bryant, he at least appears to engage with ideas and text in a manner that defies ‘temporal eras’. So again we have a further evidence of the need for a bifurcation,…
-
The Modern of Post Modernism; The Anthropocene, Object Orientation and the Possibility of Ground.
I feel it is time to clear the air; the smoke of post-modernism still seems to linger. It is time we come to terms with what Post-Modernism means, what it meant, what it is. There is no debate in this; any debate that would uphold a sort of PM catch-all has missed the issue.…
-
Comment on the comment of Tom Sparrow’s “The End of Phenomenology”.
The New Realism is just that: A manner of justification for a new reality. No big deal; its cool. I just wonder how critical they go. What is their purpose. Well, an intro to Toms book goes like this: “In the 20th century, phenomenology promised a method that would get…
You must be logged in to post a comment.