So much in here and quite councidental to our comments in the previous posts. 

(Dark a kind of ‘stationary’ appraisal of future as an in-itself object, parallel as opposed, maybe,  to Ingolds ‘right angle’. 

Music, perhaps, as we were talking of movement of meaning, Ingold here a further metaphysicall removed theory that emerges from a kind of ‘first level’ meaning)

It appears to me, though, that argument its self must take a particular form, such that we need not take Ingolds meaning as some metaphysical ‘truth’ of all things, bur rather an indication of the potential in meaningful routes.  

Check it out:  
http://syntheticzero.net/2016/03/11/knowledge-isnt-transmitted-w-tim-ingold/