CFP: 5th International Conference on Interactivity, Language & Cognition: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Cognitive and …

5th International Conference on Interactivity, Language & Cognition: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Cognitive and Language …

CFP: 5th International Conference on Interactivity, Language & Cognition: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in the Cognitive and …

—- Soundsgood. I hope its results stays good. For, typical how things like this go is the “tenderness” is really addressing the usual attitudes of the ‘quant’ group, and so what happens is the “qual” get shut out anyways because all the quantitative people are trying to be more “tender”, And in so doing totally miss what qualitative is supposed to indicate. And then on the other side, the ’qual’ People are already indoctrinated interviewing what is the qualities of things in a quantitative manner, which is to say as if qualities can be lumped into subjective descriptions that are than quantified in the effort of making it scientific and empirical.

So I think it’s a good thing but I’m not keeping my hopes up.

Because the true issue is empiricism itself, and less how we qualify what arises inside of empirical reality. As well “cognition” itself is already a quantified unit qualified by at not being so. 

Author: landzek

My name is Lance Kair, a philosopher, a counselor and a musician who is being questioned.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s