Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 2
Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 2
Navigating the potential involved with the Collapse of narrative space can be understood through a psychoanalytical frame, begging a question of how to allow narratives to include a possibility for their own Avenue a dissolution without recourse to a post-traumatic fantasy.
Essays in mental health philosophy—less “tips,” more why things work (or don’t). I look at the first principles under therapy, psychiatry, psychology, and everyday life, and occasionally share notes from papers and books-in-progress.
This space stands alongside—not inside—my counseling practice. If you’re seeking therapy in Colorado, there’s a link in the footer.
Lance Kair, LPC, blends philosophy, mindfulness, and counseling to help clients find agency, meaning, fulfillment, and healing through deep understanding, self-awareness, and compassionate therapeutic collaboration.
Copyright © 2025 Lance Kair, LPC | Website by TechG
11 responses to “Good Example of Discursive Expansion of A Singular Linguistic Collapse.”
By deploying discourse throughout a calendar, and by giving a date to each of its elements, one does not obtain a definitive hierarchy of precessions and originalities; this hierarchy is never more than relative to the systems of discourse that it sets out to evaluate.
— Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, [Fou, 143]
http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Differential_Logic_and_Dynamic_Systems_2.0#Differential_of_Conjunction
I am not sure of your point with that quote.
That was just the first of my personal associations to your comment beginning, “Contrary to Postmodern permissions of discourse, I do not propose that there are identities which span ontologies through terms necessarily. …” It’s always possible I missed both Foucault’s point and yours.
Well…one can take F quote there as a grounds to make anything we want from discourse : if it makes sense then it is true. PM has opened the door to a lot of theoretical fudge: like the recent folks who submitted bogus papers that were actually published as legitimate work. (I reposted a few ago) F was pre-PM..
But there’s a lot of theoretical jousting ; I think most claimed “PM” theory is based on a misunderstanding, a mistaken apprehension of the situation.
My point is that while we are able indeed the construct any sense we are able, it doesn’t mean it has validity.
So for example: I don’t know anything another differential calculus, but I was able to draw from your limited presentation a meaning that corresponds with a point I like to make: hence, it is at once an example of a collapsing of a particular narrative as well as an opening, and, the description of the case.
This does not mean that differential calculus necessarily describes Personal Being; it merely means that Being arises to itself through various discursive analogies.
Was it something I said?
Lol
You’re being funny, right ?
Sure, but I was getting a bit of that feeling I get When Paradigms Collide …
👽><🐷. Lol. Yes.
Yours made for a good analogy.
Contrary to Postmodern permissions of discourse, I do not propose that there are identities which span ontologies through terms necessarily. For example, the terms you use to talk about a topic and my appropriation of them. I do see a correspondence, but it is best to keep in mind the use of analogue in such cases as opposed to identity, I feel. We are less prone then to launch those so eagerly waiting for a grand coincidence into fantastical space. 🌌🌌🌌🌠🌌🌌🌌
….but if you are familiar with Alain Badiou, he finds good Use of math when speaking of ontological truth.
On a completely different note, how’d that book come along you did that video plug for some time ago? Self-publish it yet? Still working on it?