Perhaps a little bitty on postmodernism and the, what could be labeled of our current situation, post-post-modern-modernism. Here are a couple links that roughly define the conventional problem I will address in this essay. The first is a little less ridiculous than than the second. The first offers us an argument for why postmodernism is… Continue reading Post-post-modern-modernism: The Mistake of Irony; Or, The Ironic Mistake.
If we are steadfast in our undertaking we will not labor our attitude of righteousness. Yet, we likewise must not fall back into the comfort of the easy way. The challenge is to indeed be challenged, and not to again be presented with another variation of puzzle, for by now the puzzles are seen to… Continue reading Non-Philosophy and Aphilosophy: Departure. An Exercise of Metalepsis; Spinoza and the term part 2; Laruelle and the Quadripartite.
If I am saying so myself: this title is pretty fkg great; hilarious. Anyways.... My reply to a comment by Mr. Adkins came out pretty good, so I'm posting it (with some editing): Mr. Adkins: - ""There is no contradiction where there is radical duality". Also, the excerpt above is interesting, the one about there… Continue reading Direct Tangent 6.5: What I Think Is A Pretty Good Indication of My Position.
I hope you have a good appetite. We are at a table in a restaurant. Laruelle is my dinner partner in the seat next to me. He is having non-philosophy as his main dish; ironically, I have have opted for the buffet. There are others at our table but they have not been introduced. Many… Continue reading Direct Tangent 5.31: Radical, Immanence and Faith.
I am a bit hard-headed. I think most critical thinkers/philosophers are. I find this the best basic method for my endeavor, which is a grounding of my experience in discourse. In this effort I have come across, what I could call, using the most true, and possibly non-philosophical sense of the term, guru that have… Continue reading Direction 5.18: Recant and Reoccasion.
Its about time I get to the point. I have spent plenty of time talking around the issue. I have talked about Bad Faith and mentioned the issue, I've talked about aspects of the issue and indicated that all this has to do with the reason why Laruelle seems bogged down in jargon. I feel… Continue reading Direct Tangent 4.28: What can I say ? Part 1.
What gives? This is the question. In partial thanks to Mr. Adkins, his site translation of some of Laruelle's writings, that these came up rather early in a Google search for 'non-philosophy project', as well his willingness to actually read a post of mine and then to comment on it, I am lead to more… Continue reading Tangent 4.19: what gives? The possibility of Communicating.