Weird Racism

I guess there are ignorant people who think that CRT means people are weak ? And that everything unequal or not equitable is always based in systemic injustice based on group/color of skin?

And these are university professors, prep school admin and university policy makers?


Who ever saw that as true?

From where is this dude getting his fuel??


The point has always been that people often do not see the system working in their lives to oppress them in their very identity; in fact people deny it for the sake of idealist individualism.

The point of reason here is not that everything people are held back from is due to systemic injustice.


Seriously. Who the hell are we calling intellectual academics and supplying Dr. of philosophy titles to? For real; this is why just because people have letters after their name should not automatically have denoted to them a certain level of intelligence. 

I think very often people get caught up in their own little world for the sake of making a name for themselves and a salary in the name of social justice, or philosophy, whatever it is, and they lose touch with reality for the sake of the method of arguing Theory. And then they demand that reality must adhere to their theory, instead of the reverse.


In fact, a professor of American race studies who I think moved to Scotland, Tommy curry, makes a point in his book about how Kantian idealism pervades the American system in the way we currently call “whiteness”. His point is that we need to drop this particular kind of individual idealism that it’s so linked to American democracy. He draws a harder line than that, but I think his basic point about how people are so philosophically situated in blind theory, what I call idealism, is significant. 

But well his points, and indeed many peoples points are that we should change it somehow…


Maybe Badiou is corrrect; The most political move you can make is to stop engaging with politics. Because soon as you step in, you pretty much have to address yourself to idiots, and then by doing so you yourself become an idiot, but compensated for in the very post modern way of making a good living.

Maybe we should go back to the 19th century philosopher is that talk about authenticity. Maybe we should re-approach from that standpoint?

I’m sure it won’t happen.

…my point is that idealistic individualism isnever gonna go away. Kant was the prophet of modernity, kind of like a Jesus Christ of Christianity.

Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race | World news | The Guardian

The long read: For years, racism has been defined by the violence of far-right extremists, but a more insidious kind of prejudice can be found where many least expect it – at the heart of respectable society
— Read on

Don’t look behind that Curtain!

The event of Modernity is represented by the plot culmination of The Wizard of Oz: The moment that the Feminine Mystique is comprehended in its reality: The all and power Oz, the great wizard that holds the good society together is a fraud. The myth of the evil witch is destroyed upon arrival but then there is another bad witch that pronounces the struggle and the good witch helps expose the sham, thereby ushers in post-modernity. We first find the hierarchical power structure, then individual truths and relativity itself actually go into the reestablishmeant of modernity as a unitive effort of a now common whole of pluralist truths in progress, just like The Emerald City was before with all the “guilds” and various sorts, sizes, colors and shapes of people, when Dorothy arrives, all the different people who were other wise living happily except for the shadow of the wicked witch(-es) who now appears Becuase Dorothy kills her sister when she arrives. Now that witch is gone, and everyone has their own truth (again), another specter will arise: the struggle-fantasy of the white man-woman oppression ends with the man remaining in the Fantasy Emerald City and the woman returning to her black-and-white world, of which the real figures of life were represented in the fantastic struggle.

Presently we are involved in the consolidation of a one world. This is to say, the overdetermining manner of consciousness is involved with its function of the reconciliation of difference. What such a function rejects, though, is the notice which brings to understanding that such difference and reconciliation was and is already already occurring at all times.

In reality, the current struggle always must remain paramount. The involvement with that activity is called justice.

The difference involved with the attempt to get justice for the group that is oppressed in a present condition of difference Always takes precedence over the past or historical situation. This is to say that what we learn from history informs the present struggle. Yet what we don’t learn from history, the lesson of history that should otherwise commandeer or correct the present situation for eternity, or for a kind of utopia, is that some group will always be oppressed. This is to say, in the overcoming or correction of a presented condition of oppression, another oppressive situation arises that needs to be corrected. The present situation towards justice always has to take place towards a limited ideal based in a utopian frame. The idea that there is no actual “utopia” is really a statement of empty set, because if we actually ever believed that that was true then there would be no reason to make any efforts whatsoever to address a present injustice.

The two situations that I present here exist at all times. While they may be ideological, and indeed we can find all sorts of ideological structures which will support various meanings of oppression and freedom, even that cognition itself exists within a utopian condition of oppression.

Hence the two routes. Hence the non-philosophical unilateral duality.

Due to the imperative of the present moment, which is characterized presently by an effort of reconciliation, this as opposed to “destruction” or “Deconstruction” — which is to say as a historical motion of consciousness — One is not allowed to speak of facts in a general sense, because the problem of difference has not been sufficiently reconciled into the One reality. For, if there indeed was a One Reality wherein everyone had sufficient recourse to a personal idea of freedom, happiness, or whatever sort of “good” conceptions and recourses of self in a world, then we could speak of facts, say, the “fact of the human being”, because then no one would have a recourse to an offense that the very idea of a “true fact” elicits by its very nature. This is the theological mandate of the current postmodern religious paradigm: I can only speak of “facts” under particular ethical headings.

So, in order to speak of truth and facts, As things in themselves that are actually facts and actually true things, a partition in reckoning must be erected.

There is a reason why most religions have an esoteric arm of the system of belief: Because the general real tenants of ethics and morality that the particular religious ideology pro pounds and supposes upon, understood intuitively by the congregants of that belief, do not allow a recourse to exposing the potential falsity of whatever theological structure: Ideology is mythologically self-referential (correlational). Indeed the congregants rely upon the cosmological maxim in order to go about their (our) daily lives. They (we) exist, in fact, in the absolute true world of either/or mentality, of essential choice despite what theoretical ideas might come out of them, because any theory I would come up with to describe how there may or may not be choice, whether it be evolutionarily, discursively, biologically, neurologically, socially, is a theory that is relying upon me/someone choosing to do things.

This fact of an ethically absolute true world thus does not contain all that exists, but neither does “another description” negate the “first world”; indeed other things can be known and talked about which do not answer to the “absolute true (first-ethical) world” that is the relative universe of subjective views and opinion. Much like the difference between quantum physics and classical physics, there is two absolutely true universes which do not reconcile to a further one knowledge in practice.

This is how it must be only now, but also never. As well as only in possibility.

Next Generation of justice.

Hopefully the old geezers still in Congress of a by-gone tradition of paternalistic innocence, both men and women, will be aged out of office over the next 5-15 years and such anachronistic blindness as a governing mandate will move out of our government. Hopefully the younger ignorance will have less influence.

They simply are unable to see that their ‘neutral facts’ weigh unevenly toward men. There is no arguing this with them, they are totally unable to move or see beyond their ontological myopia. This is not an intelligence or education thing, it is a time thing, a brain thing.

So we will attempt to hold down the fort to the never ending on slot of ignorance and bias, and hopefully the next generation will see our flaws and be able to bring in justice as a way of life.

Of course, people will have to play politics, but perhaps blatant ignorance will not be running the show.