Begin the Hack.

Crack the alienated philosophical subjectivity.

CLICK HERE to BEGIN THE HACK !

“…of course we can talk about snow, for example, talk about what it is, describe how it feels what it looks like, bring forth chemical structures or physical structures of snow all the various aspects of snow — but if you’ve never been to where it snows it’s all really just entertainment and speculative thinking. It’s not difficult for people to understand Phenomenalism and it’s associations with Cartesian worlds and intentionality and correlationalism in the end, because that’s right here and everyone who thinks a little bit can find that the phenomenal central thinker is right here ready at hand, as Heidegger might say. But it’s difficult for people just merely to make a jump and start talking about objects philosophically. I mean, of course we can talk about objects we see objects everywhere; it’s fun and interesting to talk about objects if only because it’s a new philosophical way to address things. But there is no philosophical way yet, none of the philosophers that are talking about speculative objects have given us a real philosophical route into why we should be able to talk about objects in these ways except that we are able to, which is not a very philosophically comforting or satisfactory answer. It’s uncomfortable for philosophers — or it should be anyways — because it’s like talking to someone who’s lived their whole life in the desert about the truth of snow. Because they’ve never seen snow, they’ve never experienced snow and not only this but they don’t know how to get to someplace where there is snow. The philosophical hack addresses these issues and ,actually, does a pretty good job at through addressing them comes up with a solution that I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone offer yet.”

Rory Andrews. Layperson thinker.

How do we go from phenomenal intention to an object ontology?

None of the speculative realist people have given us a viable route. They simply have started talking about something else, speaking in a different manner. They gave us a reason why it might be wanted, why it might be desirable and needed to start talking about the object, but they never really gave us a bridge into how we get there. Even the philosopher who coined the term, or at least made it popular, “correlationalism”,has really given us very little.

So, whether or not you’ve realized this problem and it has been nagging you for some 10 years now, or whether you just want to read an interesting philosophical book. BEGIN THE HACK.

It’s OK; no one is paying attention. In fact, most people would rather not attend to the loose ends.

CLICK HERE to BEGIN THE HACK ! The Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Event.

The Philosophical Hack: The First Part. On Sale Now !

img_3830-1

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.<>CLICK HERE to BEGIN THE HACK !

(hopefully the link will work.)

 

This is the First Part of a Six part series by Cedric Nathaniel.

Using Slavoj Zizek’s book “EVENT” as a platform, this essay is a hack into conventional philosophical reality.

It is indeed a hack: A repeated application of an algorithmic protocal upon a closed system. What is this closed system? Through the compromises developed through the Hack the closed system is defined while simultanously creating an opening to that situation many currently see as unescapable, which is to say, immenently and infinitely contained.  As part of this endeavor, the beginnings of a science of philosophy is thus put forth.

Mr. Nathaniel feels that philosophy which concerns the world should be able to be accessed by it. He thus opted to give readers bite-sized pieces to be able to enjoy and digest well.

What is The Truth?

 

Quite soon The First Part of The Philosophical Hack: The Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Event will be published.

The truth of the situation is that the notion of our “post-truth”, or the incredulity involved with not knowing how to discern what is true, is itself true.

So, what does that mean?  It means that the theoreticians which would back-step to say any thing assertive about post-truth are caught themselves in a synthetical theoretical suspension of reality which is not truly encountering the facts of the matter.

Who said that?

Truth?  Facts? No one is allowed to say these things and be speaking of the present critical-philosophical situation. At least, say it an expect to be taken seriously.

*

Using the platform of Slavoj Zizek’s “EVENT!”, the essay “The Philosophical Hack” is a hack into philosophical reality. An attempt at legitimacy.

It will be offered in, I believe at this point, 5 parts.

The author Cedric Nathaniel feels it is better for digestion to take small bites and be able to chew and enjoy thoroughly, but also to have the time to eat the whole meal.

We hope you will want to be part of the feast.

140 pages. pocketbook format. estimated price: $7

Published by Od Parcel.