Socialism, Dictatorship, Democracy, Communism

apple.news/A03-AppaITYCx3anb2KF5JA

Maybe the political scientists can help us out in this area.

But in reading this story today, some thoughts came up.

In speaking with friends and coworkers and acquaintances, the word “socialism” seems to me just like a buzz word that has no real substance when it comes to what I see as actually occurring.

And with reference to the linked article, it seems that the idea of “dictator ship” has no necessary relation to any political system in the polemical scheme between socialism and democracy. It seems to me that either one of those polemical political situations could lead to a dictator ship. And by that it seems to me that a dictatorship is more of an opportunistic Disease then it is A form of government or governing in the same category as socialism or democracy.

It seems to me that these traditional categories which supposedly define and label systems of government really are more fluid than our traditional definitions would account for.

It seems more that people are drawing upon a traditional base of people, albeit hypothetical constituency of people, that associate themselves with words and definitions that have little basis in the actuality of our current situation.

I wonder if that is really the crisis of the present that we are within right now. Less “post truth”, and more that we are realizing what the human being actually does in history, in so far as we are not exempt from history regardless of any argument we want to make about synchronic Or diachronic situations.

It appears to be more that we have an opportunity to see what it is that human beings actually do. And this opportunity arises due to the saturation of an ability to record events, thoughts, situation’s, etc., due to our ability to have a record that becomes undeniable in its actual substance.

The argumentative positions only means some thing within a certain context, and I believe that we are seeing that this context does not fall into a ubiquitous multiplicity of use, but that the multiplicity of use is one context in which we are able to know things.

I think we are in transition paradigms. Not so much to where everything just falls apart into an atomization where we can’t know anything that is true or that everything is relative, rather, that such relativity indicates one particular orientation or one particular way to understand what is going on. This thing does not argue it away or say that it is invalid or that there’s something more true to be said about the situation, rather, it just says that such the situation needs to be accepted for what it is. And that there’s something to be said, something further to be known about the human being as well as the universe.

 

Trump Impeetchmint Process Showes Were all Moroons.

Let’s face it: if their is any one thing we are finding out aboot humanity, it is that we are not special, that God did not choose us to be the noble creature in the universe, and that we are not as smart as our mindes would want to tell us.

The Trump impeechmint thing shows is blatantly that the US governmint is filled with incompitent peepel. If there is any argument to the contrarie, thin all it shows is that the person with that opion is still cot in the anachronistik view of THe Enlightenment Dellusion.

Well. Then in the US. Becuase we are a democracy, what our unkomitent government means is that we are all moronz. And becawce we live in the world, it means all human Beings are moroons.

At leste rite now.

I’d say if in the 18th senchury human beings were like 21 or something’s. Then now we are like we are 35 year olds thincking we ar so smart. Or maebee 28.

Or maybe 5.

King baby.

So frustrating.

On a tangent:

Maybe it’s time we begin to think outside if the box to develop a different kind of government. One we havnt thought of before.

I think that would show if indeed we are so smart.