Do Zizek and Peterson agree on religion? https://amorinoblog.wordpress.com/2018/05/04/do-zizek-and-peterson-agree-on-religion/ — Read on amorinoblog.wordpress.com/2018/05/04/do-zizek-and-peterson-agree-on-religion/ I’m posting this more for the Zizek clip. It is fabulous. As most often. Peterson is the Trump of critical theory; not really worth considering beyond a fact of presence .Read More Do Zizek and Peterson agree on religion?
Original post titled “Falsification”, It’s a very good outline and another reason why I tend to say that a science of philosophy is possible, but we have to take risks. Philosophy does not take risks upon its own ideas for the most part. It take risks within a career mentality, if I may stretch […]Read More Risk…
Let’s see how much people like stories. I investigate here the Big Story of the Bible as it may concern human history. I will try to fill in the Story with what I see as human course. In a way, it is a story of the Big Story, which amounts, I guess, to a type […]Read More The Story; On the Big Story: An Aphilosophical Non-philosophical Philosophical Rendition.
Whew! Those Impossible essays really get thick. So perhaps a rejoining to a more approachable speaking. But hold on! The ride is just getting fun. I have been interacting through comments and replies with Dave, who writes the blog called “Big Story Guide”. Our conversation is quite wonderful, so, just as I used our conversation […]Read More The Impossible; Part 5. Existence and the Story of Death to Life.
I subscribe to a blog called “Bigstoryguide” where he author is involved with a running commentary as he goes through the Bible. Yes, the whole Bible. His blog he calls ‘Jesus’s death to life project’. I think he just got to the New Testament. I am not a Christian; I am not religious nor prescribe […]Read More Issues and Existence.