In this Era of Prehistory, everything gets turned on its head, just like in the Pirate's of the Caribbean movie... As I have put forth in various places a "turned on its head" version of faith in the spirit of Kierkegaard (somewhere in my posts Im sure Ive spelled it out, but I surely address… Continue reading Climate Change and Pascal’s Wager.
From the Philosophical Hack (out soon): Laruelle’s is the ‘best’ conventional proof of what cannot be proven through the conventional method. I have already spoken about the distinction between Laruelle’s and my terms. Laruelle distinguishes his project by asserting a positive withdraw in reference to the real common occurrence of philosophy, to call his Non-philosophy… Continue reading The Non-Philosophy of Francois Laruelle.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/tW21P0BwnxQ?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent This guys seems to do a pretty good job of laying out some flaws in Christian thinking. via The Ridiculousness of some Christian Arguments — Christianity Simplified Comment: Notice that his argument is being made against claims of another theorist in the debate. One should ask how it is possible that he can move from… Continue reading The Fallacy of Belief: modernity and its tells.
Taking a cue from Amorinblog, I am making an attempt to speak to the notion of disparities. Lets see how is goes. What is terrorism? When we think about the activities of terrorism, a marginal view might situate terrorism in terms of truth. What we have with the possibility of terrorism is a function… Continue reading An Attempt at Discussing Some ‘Disparities’: Terrorism, Religion, Truth and Belief.
I seem to have found a significance for Anslem's proof. It may be that it is not significance for whether God might exist, but, as I have said, significance for how I present ideas. We will start with the rendition from Princeton's site. I think they have a pretty good rendition there. Without all the strict logical… Continue reading Anslem’s Argument for the Proof of the Existence of God, the Disruption of Time, and the Categorization of Philosophical Behavior.
It is an interesting excersize: The history of philosophical reductivim is written in the last half of history as a conflation of the Jewish 'unknown' and the Greek 'Logos', both of which are really the only types of 'oneness' we are capable of perceiving: a completely unknown element (Judaism) that communicates to humans as singular and specific… Continue reading The One God/ The God of One.
Ok; here is the post I meant to put: So we come to Bruno Latour, and his notion of the pass. What is it that allows for the repetition whereby self-fulfillment is denied? This is the question of 'what happened'. We will never get to answer the question of what 'is happening' until we answer… Continue reading All is Vanity, for Real…Kant, Latour and the Pass, part 2.