Some one posted a comment to this post of mine, to which I replied, but then I made it into a new posting. You can check the comments of the original post here: “We will find, inevitably, as a kind, that the only things that change are the objects of our view, and not any […]Read More Awareness: part 2
When we are too close to an event, we talk about it as from a distance. That is, what we say is automatically distanced from the event, a maximum distance. The event is thus, by this occurrence, an object. As opposed to our psychotherapeutic model, the closer we are to an event, the more dishonest […]Read More Post-modernism’s Worth.
[it appears that the most recent wordpress update has strung all the paragraph breaks together. So its like one long run on paragraph now. But the *’s do indicate a break.] Significance. What we can call the Romance is based upon and or around what I call the significant experience, which falls well in line […]Read More Repost: The Significant Event, part 1
The operative question that motivates the essays on the impossible can be formulated by the questions of determinism and contingency: Is the random aspect of the physical universe of science responsible or otherwise enacted or present in the random aspect that involves human choice, such that choice is determined by the state of the universe, […]Read More The Impossible, part 4: Spiritual Oneness and the State of Incorporated Reality.
Im gonna step a little closer to home here, just for a moment, and offer what could be considered a fictional account of life in experience. A word on faith. “Where I am offended, I have faith.” I have difficulty with a faith that must be worked for, as if some times I have faith […]Read More Further on Faith; A Reflection.
If I am saying so myself: this title is pretty fkg great; hilarious. Anyways…. My reply to a comment by Mr. Adkins came out pretty good, so I’m posting it (with some editing): Mr. Adkins: – “”There is no contradiction where there is radical duality”. Also, the excerpt above is interesting, the one about there […]Read More Direct Tangent 6.5: What I Think Is A Pretty Good Indication of My Position.
I hope you have a good appetite. We are at a table in a restaurant. Laruelle is my dinner partner in the seat next to me. He is having non-philosophy as his main dish; ironically, I have have opted for the buffet. There are others at our table but they have not been introduced. Many […]Read More Direct Tangent 5.31: Radical, Immanence and Faith.