the REPOST first : Originally posted on >ect podcast: >ect explores why philosophers are compelled to try to understand the social reality of which philosophy is a part https://soundcloud.com/ectpodcast/ect-9-in-conversation-with-ray-brassier “To really distinguish the ideal and the real is to understand how they are distinguished in practice, and not in thought – in what we do, […]Read More Ray Brassier Social Philosophy.
I seem to have found a significance for Anslem’s proof. It may be that it is not significance for whether God might exist, but, as I have said, significance for how I present ideas. We will start with the rendition from Princeton’s site. I think they have a pretty good rendition there. Without all the strict logical […]Read More Anslem’s Argument for the Proof of the Existence of God, the Disruption of Time, and the Categorization of Philosophical Behavior.
REPOST of THRE-POUND-BRAIN’s no results for ‘Cognitive Psychology of Philosophy’ and reply and reply, of Baker question, then my answer… (please check out his full essay and the comments if you are intreated in the whole thing) sbakker April 13, 2017 at 9:30 am “I don’t think I get it. So the racial theories of […]Read More Oops (title: Here).
Ok; here is the post I meant to put: So we come to Bruno Latour, and his notion of the pass. What is it that allows for the repetition whereby self-fulfillment is denied? This is the question of ‘what happened’. We will never get to answer the question of what ‘is happening’ until we answer […]Read More All is Vanity, for Real…Kant, Latour and the Pass, part 2.
From “Christo-Fiction”, by Francois Laruelle: On the next page he then goes on to say “one might perhaps speak of a subject … as one would speak of it not in terms of consciousness but rather in terms of a lived of a man, understood philosophically and religiously since it is the material or the […]Read More “The Philosophical Revolution”
Evidence and verification. The beginning of this blog began with my question upon L of why he’s using jargon to convey a simple idea; in short why is he in bad faith. It is not difficult for one to notice when they read my early essays of this blog that I had very little practical […]Read More The destruction of the transcendent.
Perhaps the title should have included “non-philosophy”. lol This talk concerns the opening whereby philosophy is indicated to its method through the ending that supersedes its domain. Specifically, and in the context of Francois Laruelle’s “Christo-fiction“, that which supersedes any conventional appropriation is the quantum. In particular, there is no philosophical posture that is able to bring […]Read More Philosophy, Colonialism and Partition.