I seem to have found a significance for Anslem’s proof. It may be that it is not significance for whether God might exist, but, as I have said, significance for how I present ideas. We will start with the rendition from Princeton’s site. I think they have a pretty good rendition there. Without all the strict logical […]Read More Anslem’s Argument for the Proof of the Existence of God, the Disruption of Time, and the Categorization of Philosophical Behavior.
Its happening. Do scientists argue over facts? If they agree on a subject, such as water, an instrument and its calibration, such as a thermometer, do they then argue that water does not freeze at zero degrees Fahrenheit ? No they do not. They agree on a particular factual method, factual in what they treat, […]Read More Science and Philosophy; or, Toward a Philosophical Science, or, a Science of Philosophy.
Ok; here is the post I meant to put: So we come to Bruno Latour, and his notion of the pass. What is it that allows for the repetition whereby self-fulfillment is denied? This is the question of ‘what happened’. We will never get to answer the question of what ‘is happening’ until we answer […]Read More All is Vanity, for Real…Kant, Latour and the Pass, part 2.
Perhaps the title should have included “non-philosophy”. lol This talk concerns the opening whereby philosophy is indicated to its method through the ending that supersedes its domain. Specifically, and in the context of Francois Laruelle’s “Christo-fiction“, that which supersedes any conventional appropriation is the quantum. In particular, there is no philosophical posture that is able to bring […]Read More Philosophy, Colonialism and Partition.
THREE POUND BRAIN Im finding has got some cool observations, often a manner of approach that seems insightful. In the discussion of a philosophical scientism, the post below appears to me to indicate more a datum, a kind of data point, over a semantic content. If we hold to the idea that indeed we […]Read More Crash Space and the Move to a ‘Science’ (of the Subject): To Ping or Not to Ping, Phenomenology and Observer Effects. REPOST
Here is an end note from my upcoming book. I have changed the title to “The Moment of Decisive Significance: A Heresy“. This is a book of blatant confrontation and direct exposure, and not of spirituality or self help. BTW: One of my ex-professors read a small bit of my unedited copy and replied to […]Read More An Brief Heretical Outline of Our Current Situation: Phenomenology and Scientism.
I find often that philosophers love to complicate everything and then turn around and tell you its simple, and then write a paper that uses all sorts of jargon. 😉 I think many philosophers dont even know any more wtf they are talking about. One might want to say or think that object orientation came […]Read More A Brief Outline of the Bases of Object Orientation.