I seem to have found a significance for Anslem’s proof. It may be that it is not significance for whether God might exist, but, as I have said, significance for how I present ideas. We will start with the rendition from Princeton’s site. I think they have a pretty good rendition there. Without all the strict logical […]Read More Anslem’s Argument for the Proof of the Existence of God, the Disruption of Time, and the Categorization of Philosophical Behavior.
Food For Thought | Who Believes What Today?Sunday’s food for thought love, sunday vibes, thoughts, Zizek, who believes what today, Inspiration, Food For Thought, lifestyle https://hewnly.wordpress.com/2017/03/05/who-believes-what-today/ Such a great little excerpt. But I think it leaves out, Or Zizek doesnt finish his thought, gets side-tracked in the middle of his point : We might already […]Read More Real Belief.
Ok; here is the post I meant to put: So we come to Bruno Latour, and his notion of the pass. What is it that allows for the repetition whereby self-fulfillment is denied? This is the question of ‘what happened’. We will never get to answer the question of what ‘is happening’ until we answer […]Read More All is Vanity, for Real…Kant, Latour and the Pass, part 2.
Reply to Terrence Blake’s recent post over at Agent Swarm: As usual Terrence you pegged it. It’s strange how I view it and actually I can totally agree with you and yet somehow there’s something that I’m not agreeing with and really that has to do with my work, The strange situation that I find […]Read More …and sowing the seeds: Reply to Blake with draft excerpts from “The Second Moment”.
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.Read More Protected: “Absolution” on SCRIBD.
Some one posted a comment to this post of mine, to which I replied, but then I made it into a new posting. You can check the comments of the original post here: “We will find, inevitably, as a kind, that the only things that change are the objects of our view, and not any […]Read More Awareness: part 2
(Da Sein and the Phenomenon, part 2) If we pay attention, then we may notice that we have been deceived. But most do not notice. The distinction, then, is made between these two ‘awarenesses’, these two ‘knowledges’. So we have really three distinctions, three ‘modes’ evidenced in philosophical authorship. One; of the deception. Denial that there […]Read More The Fallacy of Realism.