The irony is that blogging, by its very nature, is a motion of modern subjective materialism.
People who are interested in true substance are not often reading blogs.
In true Zizekian form, The blogosphere is a place where imaginary transcendence is verified to an absolute epistemological horizon.
The question is: might we speak of this transcendence directly, instead of perpetually suspending it in what we might want to call the “spirit affirming“ nothingness of semantic inspiration, aka religious Spirituality?
Then, we should note what offends.
For, this offense marks where discussion stops. Where discussion revolves and involves nothing of substance.
What we are asking for with object orientation is to continue the discussion into that uncomfortable area.
Leave a Reply