I have suggested earlier that the traditional philosophical categories might be insufficient to convey the complexity of our coming realty.
So I’m playing with new categories. Ones that would interact dynamically, of course.
these new categories are based in a non-reductive ontology or plural grounding. Universal in its universality as opposed to universal in its specifically Conceptual human framing.
1). Thinking/ conventional. This would amount to traditional philosophy of scholars and big names and arguments.
2) Pedestrian. This would amount to various philosophies that people have about living regular life stuff. Like, my philosophy of adding salt to cream of wheat.
3) science. This would be a new philosophical category that sees science as a philosophy in its own right, with its own ontological base.
4) Veridical. This arm would address totalities without religious bias (as I will discuss).
5) metaphysical. This would be ideological and critical theoretical philosophy.
Share this:
