What the fuck!? The great question of our age. Truth Value?

What the fuck!? The great question of our age

What the fuck!? The great question of our age
— Read on markcarrigan.net/2018/12/29/what-the-fuck-the-great-question-of-our-age/

Due to so much (infinite) supply of information, the value of information goes down, infinitely. If we agree with the supply and demand model.

The value could be said to thus be retained totally in the act, over whether there is any intrinsic value of exchange: the exchange rate is so devalued due to a excessive surplus of supply, Truth itself loses its meaning.

Hence, exchange is essentially valueless, occurring despite what information is available, despite how we want to find something to substantiate it by.

What is left is the pure act. Value thus arises outside of exchange rate. Becuase it occurs consistent with the bare act, no longer dependent upon the exchange as an indicator of value. The irony thus places the value of the act outside of time, justified atemporally, “suspended” if you will.

There is no return. To recoup the loss of the value of exchange does not occur in time. It is too late. There’s no time left to recoup the value of truth. What occurs for reality (where exchange still occurs as though there is intrinsic value) then is the shift to the postmodern reality that is denied in its religious capacity; Faith shows itself too what essentially lay outside of the temporal exchange. This kind of knowledge, what we could call true knowledge, or the knowledge of what is truly occurring, (which could be called scientific philosophical knowledge) cannot be recouped until a later moment.

But contrary to the economy which recoups Real economic value, what lay outside of itself (The conventional philosophical reality) is not nothing, nor it is it spiritual, nor is it some sort of absence or void. These types of negations, referring to the zero or one result of that must occur in every conventional philosophical reduction (see my previous post on quantum computing), merely recites the liturgy of the One universe upheld through its activity.

This does not explain an activity that is involved in real politics or the real economy, as though a proper understanding of the situation will allow the value to once again be attained and exchanged, but indeed this failure is what allows for a glut in the market. For the real economy is based in individuals whose sense of truth comes from the real (conventional) exchange. And hence we have the definition of how value arises within a religious context.

*

We are in the long game.

Author: landzek

My name is Lance Kair, a philosopher, a counselor and a musician who is being questioned.

8 thoughts on “What the fuck!? The great question of our age. Truth Value?”

  1. Ben Rhodes, former deputy national security advisor in BHA Administration:

    “All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus. Now they don’t. They call us to explain to them what’s happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.”

    “They call us to explain to them what’s happening.”

    “They literally know nothing.”

    Political journalists are primarily left leaning political hacks that regurgitate leaks from unnamed sources, or quote named sources while presenting same in a favorable light. Bob Woodward was not Sherlock Holmes. He was spoon fed leaks.

    Political journalists are left leaning political hacks. This is causing right leaning populist uprising and citizen journalism. This threatens the Deep State power base. The mainstream media is being bypassed. Their resentment and destructive “opinion” attack journalism is on 7/24 hour display.

    With regard to your’e there is no truth due to over supply abstractions, I’m not sure anyone should receive an award = value for participation. Unless maybe the pursuit and attainment of virtue (subjective competing meanings) is it’s own reward?

    Perhaps.

    But if Critical Theory is correct, that there is no truth, just competing power narratives, and that nihilism is our absurd reward, then why should philosophers care? That’s a rhetorical question. If correct, Participation is equivalent to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/05/05/white-house-official-on-some-reporters-overseas-expertise-they-literally-know-nothing/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.43126d2bbe2a

    1. Maybe no one has ever cared. Maybe it’s all a political fantasy and always has been; just the lenses have changed.

      I am suggesting, though, a possible ontological reason for the Phenomenon. I am not really making a value judgement upon it.

      I am saying, maybe if this is the case, then it is the utter vacancy which reality supplies that indicates the substance of which Kierkegaard and others have been attempting to give voice to, the substance through it being misappropriated as having real substance which has brought about the oversupply of information, or the perception and resultant reality that sees a glut in the informational economy.

    2. And…I am not totally sure what you mean by left and right. Politically. I have an ideA that you use these tropes in order situate a scheme to meal meaning of what appears to be occurring, but I have difficulty in accepting that All left…and All right political agents are behaving in this manner.

      Perhaps I could be better to speak of “forces” or “political theoretical entities” which behave this way according to the signifying theoretical scaffolding ? I’m not sure.

      But in general I think you description can describe what is occurring. But I’m not sure if it cuts so cleanly.

      Wasn’t it you who coined the “dirty pM”. ? That to me means that Pm is a functioning aspect of subjectivity, in which various agents assert themselves as real actors.

      Personally I think that we are indeed still subjects of the PM condition that Lyotard defined. That the left and right are not able, by virtue of the technology whereby they find themselves, to extricate essential cleanly defined forces, and so assert their “PM right” to define themselves as they wish in their own realities. But I do not think that All actors are necessarily confined; only those who have no need to see their way out Becuase of the effective theory. But it is, in essence, a “theory” within a meta discourse that is PM.

      My books of course go into this stuff…lol.

      1. PM exists. It is a phenomenon, My prior dirty reference was PM regimes historically have demonstrated superior kill its own citizen head count power in modern wars if we believe the credibility of the competing accountant narratives.

        I’m more eclectic in orientation, seeking answers to life’s deepest questions: who, what, where, why, how, when, because, if, then, else.

        PM is obscurantism to me.

        I do not think that all Journalistic actors are necessarily confined to rigid left-right thinking.

        PM orientation has proven its historical violence in politics. After power is achieved the intellectual useful idiot theorists are normally disposed of (Eric Hoeffer “True Believers”).

        Humanity is fleshly tragic dramatic actors in space and time. It finds itself in a world unable to answer those core questions except through questing after them through struggle. This tragedy must have a cause, without which it is absurd.

        Humanity is either guilty of transcendent crimes from eternity (from which there is no beginning), in which case it is deserving of its fate, or absurd.

        It cannot be both.

      2. I might have an answer for you. You might actually appreciate it.

        My book is on its way to printers. It takes a couple weeks to get the proof.

        🤘🏾

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s