I added a page to the menu above. I don’t know if a Page prints as a Post so I am posting the page.😄
The point of this whole thing is to find the destruction of the transcendent.
My work is toward a complete explanation of religion. One that explains every cultural facet or expression of what we generally know as religious or superstitious belief.
By exposing the common basis of religious belief, to thereby be able to explain all religious or theological propositions, The effect or the need that religion Fulfills will likewise be exposed beyond merely an explanation of psychological dimensions. It will strike at the very core of knowledge itself.
And due to the nature and thoroughness of this exposition, such knowledge, what we could call academic philosophy will be described for its limitations, applications and uses.
In contrast to the wiki definition
Philosophy of religion: “the philosophical examination of the central themes and concepts involved in religious traditions.” These sorts of philosophical discussion are ancient, and can be found in the earliest known manuscripts concerning philosophy. The field is related to many other branches of philosophy, including metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.”
My philosophy of religion could be better called a “religious philosophy￼” because of the workings of its point to expose that which is religious, to thereby likewise critique philosophy.
The conventional philosophical definition that wiki has really assumes as it imposes that there is a hierarchy of thought, that somehow reason is a category that is better than or somehow more able to grasp truth than religion. One might wonder why there is no rreligion of philosophy, which is to say study of philosophy through religion.
Does anyone have any ideas why religion cannot study philosophy?
Why is it that philosophy always ggets to study religion?