CFA for SAF at Central APA, Denver https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2018/06/28/cfa-for-saf-at-central-apa-denver/ — Read on feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2018/06/28/cfa-for-saf-at-central-apa-denver/Read More CFA for SAF at Central APA, Denver
For Example: For an Aberrant Theory https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2018/06/25/for-example-for-an-aberrant-theory/ — Read on larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2018/06/25/for-example-for-an-aberrant-theory/Read More For Example: For an Aberrant Theory
Two routes. There is much to say about these philosophers and their solutions. And I think they’re feeling or being touched upon by the right conclusions so far is the condition that we are in.Read More Malabou and the Anthropocene.
It’s Juneteenth https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2018/06/19/its-juneteenth/ — Read on feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2018/06/19/its-juneteenth/Read More It’s Juneteenth
call for papers: “Objects Across the Traditions” https://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2018/06/13/call-for-papers-objects-across-the-traditions/ — Read on doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2018/06/13/call-for-papers-objects-across-the-traditions/ Communication across the disciplines. I feel that what we are finding today, which is really still within the postmodern dilemma, is that the institution, or the manner of methodological propriety, has defined a space of activity where the subject agent is supposed to […]Read More An Occasion to Discuss Our Current Methodological Block:: Call for papers: “Objects Across the Traditions”
iiraorg.com/2018/06/06/envenoment-an-evacuation-towards-a-feminism-without-example-in-ten-parts/ Dude is on the right track. But I would say that we likewise cannot reject ‘philosophy’ on a whole, like ‘breathing’ cannot be simply discounted through a manipulation of terms. Breathing what? Should be the question. Oxygen is usually good, but chlorine gas is not so good to breathe. Hence, philosophy remains as indeed […]Read More There’s Philosophy and then there’s Philosophy.
READING “READING MARX” (2): we have always been non-standard https://terenceblake.wordpress.com/2018/06/03/reading-reading-marx-2-we-have-always-been-non-standard/ — Read on terenceblake.wordpress.com/2018/06/03/reading-reading-marx-2-we-have-always-been-non-standard/ Not sure if I agree with Blake’s comments. But my response will come later.Read More READING “READING MARX” (2): we have always been non-standard