Speciality.

Might we discern a philosophy’s secretly denied reliance upon a transcendent other and its special communion with such a theological entity by its intricate and nimble arguments and proposals? And then judge its veracity by the activity it evidences and what it actually does?

Could the most valued of Philosophy be that which decries its special place? That which does the most service to the existence around it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s