Due to the question of philosophy’s Being moved to the margin for the sake of human necessity, some questions arise, likewise, necessarily.
In the determination of Being, what is Being left out?
Is the knowledge of things determinable?
Is there an obligation in the knowledge of Being?
Does history convey a requirement in the designation of Being?
Does a correct history equate to true Being?
Is doing universal, or momentary? Primary or subsequent?
Is knowledge of doing possible?
Can one speak to the future? the past? without a present comprehension?
Must power be recognized?
Does ethics demand a question of power?
If power is not recognized, is a condemnation of Being in order?
Is the questioning of authority, under its authority, possible?
How can the righteousness of doing be ascertained?
At certain times, is it moral to allow authority to remain unquestioned?
Is nothing part of knowledge?
or a place holder for knowledge?
Must I acquiesce to every condition?
under what condition?
Am I responsible?