ALTexploit has a Great post this morning.
It describes one arm of the issue at hand, what I call thePoint of Contension. The issue has to do with how conventional theory (political-ideological) usurps the meaning of discourse for its own purposes, and how this possibility can arise as knowledge. For we could not really know this unless there was another corresponding object held out of view by which to have this item, against which such knowledge precipitates out so to be seen. I reject the ontological recourse to ‘nothing’, and replace the object of nothing with afeature that removes the inherent ironic redundnxy of modern thought.