(Note: this post has been voice dictated and largely on edited . Lol)
One can’t be too surprised when there is a large fight at the mall after Christmas, and then that there’s other fights at other malls for whatever chain reaction Evento cause explanation someone wants to give to it. 

And yet it is kind of surprising when there is a large fight at a local mall the day after Christmas because there was so many people at the mall. I think it is really this surprise that I have and then the resultant explanation that goes on in my head and then the juxtaposition of myself that I would never go to the mall north think of going to the mall the day after Christmas- all this that makes me say human beings are fucking idiots.

And then perhaps it is a kind of maturity that begins to see the real state of what a human being is. Maybe we can even equate it in a certain sense to the election of Donald Trump. I think despite all the intellectual applications that want to go into political causes in reasons and strategies of why such as surprising event took place, it really comes down to those of us who presume upon intelligence and some sort of progress of that intelligence as a sort of leader for the rest of humanity — it really comes down to that this intelligent isn’t leading anyone. In fact it could be that this intelligence is really only leading those who think their other certain intelligence to believe that they’re leading the rest of humanity, where as the rest of humanity really behaves along the lines of nothing of the sort that we call or want to believe as a sort of educated intelligence. It may be this reality that people of this so-called intelligence, what I tend to generalize as enlightenment, don’t want to admit. Which is really that human beings are nothing more than animals except that they have this thing called technology that seems to enforce this so-called progress of enlighten meant. Human beings when it comes down to it act stupidly and behave stupidly and come up with reasons for acting in such a way that really make no sense in light of what we might want to call intelligence. We call this common activity this common human being that does things, we want to extrapolate ourselves into this human being is common human being and say that there’s this intelligence going on somewhere inside of them, most likely centered and what we know as a brain, and intelligence that we can appeal to for their irrationality or their stupid Activity. But then you have people getting in a fight at the mall the day after Christmas. Call me simpleminded but whoever engaged in that activity is fucking dumb. Whatever we might want to call intelligence has failed. And whatever cause or explanation we want to put on that and those people as they are part of this common intelligent human being race of sorts, really just functions in the way I just said: it functions to deny that they’re idiots. It functions to include them in the humanity of which we cannot be idiots. It functions to justify my enlightened mind into the common humanity, because if there is an a common humanity then my enlightened mind is not so enlightened. But also, the irony in this whole situation is that there must be a common humanity that I am a part of that did not is that the people at who act in this ridiculous man or are not intelligent, because if they’re acting in such a random way that my enlightened intelligent thinking cannot gain access to nor caused them to behave any differently, then again it might mean that my enlighten mind means nothing at all.

–

So in a certain way, invested in this type of reasoning is the kind of aristocracy. There is a legitimate argument for the segregation of attributes. The enlightenment would have a common humanity that is able to be educated into intelligence. But what we find is that there are more ignorant then there are intelligent; we find that even as we make this mighty attempt to educate the noble humanity and the ignorant masses of potential, not only do we find that the ignorant masses are growing exponentially quicker than we can educate them, but we are also finding that our category by which we identify or move to promote intelligence fails quicker then we can rectify it into other sorts of categories. For example, I’m sure that there are many people involved in these so-called mall riots Who we could call educated and intelligent. Likewise there are many sports stars who are very educated but likewise do stupid things like beat up their wives or do drugs. Our ability to make new classifications that fall under the heading of the progress of intelligence for education do not develop quick enough to overcome the title wave of ignorance. We want to say then when these things happen too educated intelligent people that some sort of trauma occurred in their past, or they have some sort of physical neurological disorder; we want to say their mom died when they were five; or a Guy jilted her for her best friend when she was 15. We want to say people use drugs because they’re trying to escape something.

But none of these classifications that fall within the bracket of education and intelligence ever account for an aggregate a possibility; at best they are effective only within a small population of the whole. 

so it might be that we have to admit that the aggregate of humanity is in capable of leading itself towards any better future. This or Every type of humanity is capable of moving at south towards a better future, but a better future in reference to its own meaningful designations. Our particular type of enlightenment thinking may just be one of these types of cosmological ordering.

It may well be that the king and queen and class of aristocracy of any type of scaffolding cosmological order functions well in whatever situation of humanity whether it be inclusive andethical towards the lives of the common human being, or whether it be despotic and oppressive. Perhaps there is an a Historical oscillation that we cannot see or refuse to admit. 

But likewise it may be that and admitting of a segregation of a human attributes Mary leads to a sort of caste system such as colonial Europe discovered in India. Perhaps it was not that there was a ruling Brahma cast that subjugated the rest of the castes, but maybe more that there was just a segregation of human attributes and that each caste function within its situation of ability upon a whole social system where in Brahmas just function and likewise within their ordering.
More in a bit…