I find often that philosophers love to complicate everything and then turn around and tell you its simple, and then write a paper that uses all sorts of jargon. 😉
I think many philosophers dont even know any more wtf they are talking about.
One might want to say or think that object orientation came about due to various really in depth analyses of philosophical texts. They are wrong.
And this is not ‘realist’ or OOO. It is merely sensible given the matter at hand.
Here is a very unconventional talk, presented in a quite rebelious, anti establishment manner, about not only the reasoning behind object orientation, but also how object orientation diverges from the conventional philosophical reckoning.
(Please bare with the slow start.)