knowledge isn’t transmitted w/ tim ingold

So much in here and quite councidental to our comments in the previous posts. 

(Dark a kind of ‘stationary’ appraisal of future as an in-itself object, parallel as opposed, maybe,  to Ingolds ‘right angle’. 

Music, perhaps, as we were talking of movement of meaning, Ingold here a further metaphysicall removed theory that emerges from a kind of ‘first level’ meaning)

It appears to me, though, that argument its self must take a particular form, such that we need not take Ingolds meaning as some metaphysical ‘truth’ of all things, bur rather an indication of the potential in meaningful routes.  

Check it out:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s